38 of 53 directional; one Neutral
In this legacy historical subset, opposing the displayed direction scored more often than following it.
Across 61 qualifying Entertainment-containing events, 60 had a non-zero directional legacy outcome: 21 followed the displayed BSP direction, 39 opposed it and one was Neutral.
- Status
- Exploratory
- Dataset
- bsp-source-audit-v2
- Parser
- bsp-mailbox-parser-v2
Examine it
What was counted?
Consolidated events whose normalised industry label contains Entertainment and has a legacy workbook-linked PQ outcome plus a non-tied displayed direction. Zero moves are Neutral and excluded from the directional rate.
Under a simple fifty-fifty binomial comparison, the unadjusted two-sided p-value is 0.0273. That asks how surprising this split would be under that narrow model. It does not correct for the wider feature search or prove a future edge.
Make it clickWhat does this p-value actually say?
A p-value asks how unusual the observed result would be if a particular chance-only model were true.
Read the full guideTaxonomy matters
“Entertainment” is not one automatic bucket.
39 of 60 directional; one Neutral
The exact label produces the stronger historical rate, while the broader definition also includes Movies & Entertainment. Both are disclosed because changing the taxonomy changes the claim.
Stability
The yearly slices point the same way, but each is small.
The opposite-direction rate ranges from 58.3% to 76.9% by year. None of these small yearly slices is decisive on its own, and the 2026 slice ends in May.
Validation
It also appears later—but later data was already exposed.
A neutral calendar split uses discovery through 2024-12-31 and a later period from 2025. The hypothesis was inspected across the full archive before this split was frozen, so the replay cannot be called out-of-sample.
Multiple testing
One interesting result came from a wider search.
This observation belongs to the Industry × displayed-direction features family. Tradour reports 50 related industry groups at the declared sample threshold. Its p-value is therefore descriptive, not a Playbook promotion rule.
Exploratory scan: No p-value promotion; freeze a canonical-price candidate before genuinely unseen validation.
What could make this misleading?
This finding is not ready for promotion.
- This is an in-sample historical comparison, not prospective evidence.
- The legacy PQ outcome is linked from a later BSP email; its price source and economic horizon are not independently established.
- The canonical first-public-information-session outcome cannot be calculated from the supplied files because auditable market prices and publication/session metadata are absent.
- The result sits inside a wider feature scan, so its unadjusted p-value does not resolve multiple-testing risk.
- The full archive was inspected before this validation structure was frozen; the later-period replay is exposed and not out-of-sample.
Audit it
How was this produced?
Direct Daily Stock Market Forecast emails were parsed across three observed HTML schema families. Forwards and replies were excluded; no APR24-15M or Gainers / Losers messages were present.
All 9,177 parsed rows agreed with the supplied workbook on every compared core field. The global raw/displayed inversion is explicit.
Legacy outcomes reproduce the workbook's next-quarter email link over a 45–140 day gap. The canonical Day 1 definition is versioned separately and remains unavailable until auditable prices, calendars and publication timestamps are supplied.
